Discussion:
Question of the day
(too old to reply)
Joe
2011-01-24 17:59:37 UTC
Permalink
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.


Imagine two women in this scenario.

One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.

The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.

Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"

Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.

How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?

Joe
Checkmate
2011-01-24 18:30:29 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her. I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances. Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-24 18:50:18 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her.  I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances.  Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
“Desperate faggots” don’t do it with women of any size. Faggots are
for the most part only attracted to guys but the gays that do
condescend to have sex with women will generally look for a slender
flat-chested type. That specific body type reminds them of young men
and in doing so they are more able to achieve sexual gratification.
Anyone who thinks gay men are attracted to fat women are obviously
trying to detract from the truth. Why they would do such a thing is a
matter of conjecture but in your case we are pretty certain it’s
diversion designed to hide ones sexual orientation.

As for you jumping the skinny one, we all know the only way you would
jump her is if she was a hermaphrodite and she had a visible penis,
lol.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-24 19:01:12 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her.  I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances.  Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
?Desperate faggots? don?t do it with women of any size. Faggots are
for the most part only attracted to guys but the gays that do
condescend to have sex with women will generally look for a slender
flat-chested type. That specific body type reminds them of young men
and in doing so they are more able to achieve sexual gratification.
How would you know how fags think if you aren't a faggot?
Anyone who thinks gay men are attracted to fat women are obviously
trying to detract from the truth.
I think you married a fat desperate woman who couldn't get a normal man in
order to appear straight. Of course, it's only natural for her to expect you
to service her occasionally. It's gotta be a nasty job, but I guess someone's
got to do it, and anyone who likes getting poked in the ass is likely to be
capable of anything.
Why they would do such a thing is a
matter of conjecture but in your case we are pretty certain it?s
diversion designed to hide ones sexual orientation.
As for you jumping the skinny one, we all know the only way you would
jump her is if she was a hermaphrodite and she had a visible penis,
lol.
So you have a fascination with chicks with dicks as well?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-24 19:51:57 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her.  I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances.  Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
?Desperate faggots? don?t do it with women of any size. Faggots are
for the most part only attracted to guys but the gays that do
condescend to have sex with women will generally look for a slender
flat-chested type. That specific body type reminds them of young men
and in doing so they are more able to achieve sexual gratification.
How would you know how fags think if you aren't a faggot?
How do you know the earth orbits the sun, dumbass? It’s called
knowledge; check it out sometime, you can find a lot of stuff like
that hidden in books.

BTW wasn’t it you who made the “desperate faggot” assertion? How did
you come by that info and what gives you the idea that it is somehow
relevant? Idiot.
Anyone who thinks gay men are attracted to fat women are obviously
trying to detract from the truth.
I think you married a fat desperate woman who couldn't get a normal man in
order to appear straight.  Of course, it's only natural for her to expect you
to service her occasionally.  It's gotta be a nasty job, but I guess someone's
got to do it, and anyone who likes getting poked in the ass is likely to be
capable of anything.
I’m not going to argue the point that being “poked in the ass” is a
rather base form of sex which enables you to stomach just about
anything because you would know better than I. But comparing it to
having hetro sex with a fat chick is a matter of opinion that a fag
like you really has no business talking about. You have said in this
very thread that you don’t have sex with fat women “under any
circumstances” and since that is the case; where are you drawing your
comparison from? Obviously you are as full of shit as always. Snippy
fags like you aren’t capable of having sex with anything but man ass.
Claiming otherwise, especially when you’re a skin flute player is just
denial.
Why they would do such a thing is a
matter of conjecture but in your case we are pretty certain it?s
diversion designed to hide ones sexual orientation.
As for you jumping the skinny one, we all know the only way you would
jump her is if she was a hermaphrodite and she had a visible penis,
lol.
So you have a fascination with chicks with dicks as well?
No not really but I’m sure a dick hungry dude like you would be if
given half a chance.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-24 20:52:10 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her.  I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances.  Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
?Desperate faggots? don?t do it with women of any size. Faggots are
for the most part only attracted to guys but the gays that do
condescend to have sex with women will generally look for a slender
flat-chested type. That specific body type reminds them of young men
and in doing so they are more able to achieve sexual gratification.
How would you know how fags think if you aren't a faggot?
How do you know the earth orbits the sun, dumbass? It?s called
knowledge; check it out sometime, you can find a lot of stuff like
that hidden in books.
BTW wasn?t it you who made the ?desperate faggot? assertion? How did
you come by that info and what gives you the idea that it is somehow
relevant? Idiot.
Anyone who thinks gay men are attracted to fat women are obviously
trying to detract from the truth.
I think you married a fat desperate woman who couldn't get a normal man in
order to appear straight.  Of course, it's only natural for her to expect you
to service her occasionally.  It's gotta be a nasty job, but I guess someone's
got to do it, and anyone who likes getting poked in the ass is likely to be
capable of anything.
I?m not going to argue the point that being ?poked in the ass? is a
rather base form of sex which enables you to stomach just about
anything because you would know better than I. But comparing it to
having hetro sex with a fat chick is a matter of opinion that a fag
like you really has no business talking about. You have said in this
very thread that you don?t have sex with fat women ?under any
circumstances? and since that is the case; where are you drawing your
comparison from? Obviously you are as full of shit as always. Snippy
fags like you aren?t capable of having sex with anything but man ass.
Claiming otherwise, especially when you?re a skin flute player is just
denial.
Why they would do such a thing is a
matter of conjecture but in your case we are pretty certain it?s
diversion designed to hide ones sexual orientation.
As for you jumping the skinny one, we all know the only way you would
jump her is if she was a hermaphrodite and she had a visible penis,
lol.
So you have a fascination with chicks with dicks as well?
No not really but I?m sure a dick hungry dude like you would be if
given half a chance.
Ragnar
If all you have to add to this discussion is a bunch of IKYABWAI's, why don't
you just go jerk off or something, and quit wasting MY time?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-24 21:07:48 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her.  I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances.  Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
?Desperate faggots? don?t do it with women of any size. Faggots are
for the most part only attracted to guys but the gays that do
condescend to have sex with women will generally look for a slender
flat-chested type. That specific body type reminds them of young men
and in doing so they are more able to achieve sexual gratification.
How would you know how fags think if you aren't a faggot?
 How do you know the earth orbits the sun, dumbass? It?s called
knowledge; check it out sometime, you can find a lot of stuff like
that hidden in books.
BTW wasn?t it you who made the ?desperate faggot? assertion? How did
you come by that info and what gives you the idea that it is somehow
relevant? Idiot.
Anyone who thinks gay men are attracted to fat women are obviously
trying to detract from the truth.
I think you married a fat desperate woman who couldn't get a normal man in
order to appear straight.  Of course, it's only natural for her to expect you
to service her occasionally.  It's gotta be a nasty job, but I guess someone's
got to do it, and anyone who likes getting poked in the ass is likely to be
capable of anything.
 I?m not going to argue the point that being ?poked in the ass? is a
rather base form of sex which enables you to stomach just about
anything because you would know better than I. But comparing it to
having hetro sex with a fat chick is a matter of opinion that a fag
like you really has no business talking about. You have said in this
very thread that you don?t have sex with fat women ?under any
circumstances? and since that is the case; where are you drawing your
comparison from? Obviously you are as full of shit as always. Snippy
fags like you aren?t capable of having sex with anything but man ass.
Claiming otherwise, especially when you?re a skin flute player is just
denial.
Why they would do such a thing is a
matter of conjecture but in your case we are pretty certain it?s
diversion designed to hide ones sexual orientation.
As for you jumping the skinny one, we all know the only way you would
jump her is if she was a hermaphrodite and she had a visible penis,
lol.
So you have a fascination with chicks with dicks as well?
No not really but I?m sure a dick hungry dude like you would be if
given half a chance.
Ragnar
If all you have to add to this discussion is a bunch of IKYABWAI's, why don't
you just go jerk off or something, and quit wasting MY time?
For this being such a waste of your time, you sure do jump to the
response, lol.
I guess if you found our conversations more worth while I would need
to learn how to type faster.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-24 22:39:42 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I'd jump the skinny one, but I'd probably want to hose her down before I hosed
her.  I don't do fat chicks under any circumstances.  Only desperate faggots
who want to look straight do that.
?Desperate faggots? don?t do it with women of any size. Faggots are
for the most part only attracted to guys but the gays that do
condescend to have sex with women will generally look for a slender
flat-chested type. That specific body type reminds them of young men
and in doing so they are more able to achieve sexual gratification.
How would you know how fags think if you aren't a faggot?
 How do you know the earth orbits the sun, dumbass? It?s called
knowledge; check it out sometime, you can find a lot of stuff like
that hidden in books.
BTW wasn?t it you who made the ?desperate faggot? assertion? How did
you come by that info and what gives you the idea that it is somehow
relevant? Idiot.
Anyone who thinks gay men are attracted to fat women are obviously
trying to detract from the truth.
I think you married a fat desperate woman who couldn't get a normal man in
order to appear straight.  Of course, it's only natural for her to expect you
to service her occasionally.  It's gotta be a nasty job, but I guess someone's
got to do it, and anyone who likes getting poked in the ass is likely to be
capable of anything.
 I?m not going to argue the point that being ?poked in the ass? is a
rather base form of sex which enables you to stomach just about
anything because you would know better than I. But comparing it to
having hetro sex with a fat chick is a matter of opinion that a fag
like you really has no business talking about. You have said in this
very thread that you don?t have sex with fat women ?under any
circumstances? and since that is the case; where are you drawing your
comparison from? Obviously you are as full of shit as always. Snippy
fags like you aren?t capable of having sex with anything but man ass.
Claiming otherwise, especially when you?re a skin flute player is just
denial.
Why they would do such a thing is a
matter of conjecture but in your case we are pretty certain it?s
diversion designed to hide ones sexual orientation.
As for you jumping the skinny one, we all know the only way you would
jump her is if she was a hermaphrodite and she had a visible penis,
lol.
So you have a fascination with chicks with dicks as well?
No not really but I?m sure a dick hungry dude like you would be if
given half a chance.
Ragnar
If all you have to add to this discussion is a bunch of IKYABWAI's, why don't
you just go jerk off or something, and quit wasting MY time?
For this being such a waste of your time, you sure do jump to the
response, lol.
I guess if you found our conversations more worth while I would need
to learn how to type faster.
Maybe if you had both hands available you could try that.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-24 19:22:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
“Natural pheromones” do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.

The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of “natural
pheromones”.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-24 19:45:33 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
 Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
?Natural pheromones? do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.
The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of ?natural
pheromones?.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.
Ragnar
Is that what g00gle said, Doctor Ragnar?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-24 19:55:28 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
?Natural pheromones? do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.
The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of ?natural
pheromones?.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.
Ragnar
Is that what g00gle said, Doctor Ragnar?
No that’s what research anyone can find on Google says. Try it some
time, you might learn a thing or two and in the process you just might
not look so butt fucking dumb.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-24 20:54:30 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
?Natural pheromones? do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.
The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of ?natural
pheromones?.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.
Ragnar
Is that what g00gle said, Doctor Ragnar?
No that?s what research anyone can find on Google says. Try it some
time, you might learn a thing or two and in the process you just might
not look so butt fucking dumb.
Ragnar
No problem. I just wanted to establish the fact that you have a habit of
running to g00gle every time you want to sound like you're knowledgeable in
something other than buggery, cock sucking, and fatty fucking.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-24 21:17:54 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
?Natural pheromones? do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.
The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of ?natural
pheromones?.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.
Ragnar
Is that what g00gle said, Doctor Ragnar?
No that?s what research anyone can find on Google says. Try it some
time, you might learn a thing or two and in the process you just might
not look so butt fucking dumb.
Ragnar
No problem.  I just wanted to establish the fact that you have a habit of
running to g00gle every time you want to sound like you're knowledgeable in
something other than buggery, cock sucking, and fatty fucking.
Unlike you I don’t pretend to know everything but when I see someone
trying to pass bullshit off as fact I at least have enough brains to
look for info that refutes their half-assed shitty claims. In reality
most times I have the general info in my head but in order to hammer
the point across some form of credible source info IS required. This
is obviously a concept some dumbass people who frequent this group
still don’t get.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-24 22:45:02 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
?Natural pheromones? do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.
The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of ?natural
pheromones?.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.
Ragnar
Is that what g00gle said, Doctor Ragnar?
No that?s what research anyone can find on Google says. Try it some
time, you might learn a thing or two and in the process you just might
not look so butt fucking dumb.
Ragnar
No problem.  I just wanted to establish the fact that you have a habit of
running to g00gle every time you want to sound like you're knowledgeable in
something other than buggery, cock sucking, and fatty fucking.
Unlike you I don?t pretend to know everything but when I see someone
trying to pass bullshit off as fact I at least have enough brains to
look for info that refutes their half-assed shitty claims.
In reality
most times I have the general info in my head but in order to hammer
the point across some form of credible source info IS required.
Well that's a good policy for you to follow. Everyone knows the only thing
credible in YOUR head is some guy's dick.
This
is obviously a concept some dumbass people who frequent this group
still don?t get.
Did you read that in g00gle too?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-25 14:35:25 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
?Natural pheromones? do not qualify as an outgrowth of foul
bacteriological soup festering in a persons armpits or crotch, you
moron. No normal guy wants to have sex with an unwashed woman just as
no normal woman wants to have sex with a smelly guy.
The idea that humans can give off pheromones is a controversial one
and no real consensus has been reach as to what causes or creates
human pheromone production. But in almost all cases the consensus is
that an unwashed body is a deterrent to the giving off of ?natural
pheromones?.
Unlike bacteria which grow on the surface of the skin and cause body
odor, pheromones are said to be product of cellular chemical activity
that is secreted through the skin. They are also said to be almost
odorless and colorless. Although most researchers think the human body
does indeed produce chemical pheromones it is highly unlikely that a
human can detect their odor. Humans lack the olfactory vomeronasal
organ that other members of the animal kingdom have which enables them
to be highly sensitive to ranges of odor that we humans cannot
detect.
Ragnar
Is that what g00gle said, Doctor Ragnar?
No that?s what research anyone can find on Google says. Try it some
time, you might learn a thing or two and in the process you just might
not look so butt fucking dumb.
Ragnar
No problem. I just wanted to establish the fact that you have a habit of
running to g00gle every time you want to sound like you're knowledgeable in
something other than buggery, cock sucking, and fatty fucking.
Unlike you I don?t pretend to know everything but when I see someone
trying to pass bullshit off as fact I at least have enough brains to
look for info that refutes their half-assed shitty claims.
In reality
most times I have the general info in my head but in order to hammer
the point across some form of credible source info IS required.
Well that's a good policy for you to follow.  Everyone knows the only thing
credible in YOUR head is some guy's dick.
<Yawn> Your lameness is noted.
This
is obviously a concept some dumbass people who frequent this group
still don?t get.
Did you read that in g00gle too?
No, external research isn’t required to identify those who spew
unsubstantiated bullshit.

Ragnar
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2011-01-24 19:31:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
No doubt about it, I would chose the nubile young woman. I have slept with a
few nubiles who hadn't showered or bathed in several days and I sure never
noticed any offensive odor.

The first thing that arouses desire in a man is the sight of an attractive,
fit young woman. Eyes are a very big turn-on. Short hair, a nice neck and
visible ears almost as much so. Slim shoulders and nice pert breasts make
her irresistible and so forth. Men are very visually oriented. The LAST
thing a man will think about when viewing a hottie is when was the last time
the hottie bathed.

To tell the truth, any perfumes tend to give me a headache after a while or
bother my sinuses so they are a distraction and a turn-off. Some moderate to
strong, *natural* female body odors in evidence is just the opposite - a
real turn-on. And, unless the woman has a yeast infection or something her
vagina sure doesn't need to be douched and perfumed. Yuck! Just what the
heck is she trying to hide? Is she ashamed of her natural body odor? Didn't
wipe properly? C'mon! If she is that's really really dumb, it tells me she
is insecure and a victim of consumer advertising that create a fear of
natural body odors to sell a myriad of useless and often
dangerous-to-one's-health products.
--
Gregory Hall
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2011-01-24 19:46:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
The question you pose also demonstrates the difference between an alpha male
like myself and a feminized, estrogen-laden, fat loser like Ragnar.

Ragnar would jump all over the 500-pounder, of course. The result would be
wasted sperm because women that size rarely are impregnatable so his loser
genes won't get passed on. (Thank God!) This is proof of a defective mind
that deposits semen in an untenable environment like some fat fold where it
is doomed to fester and rot.

I, Gregory Hall, would immediately enjoy the superior natural nubile and the
chances are very high my sperm would end up creating a new life and the new
life would be healthy and viable because the sperm fertilized a real woman
and not some Pillsbury Doughboy caricature of one. Therefore, my DNA would
survive because my mind is not defective and knows what's best for my DNA.

Ragnar seems to have something confused. He thinks it's 'survival of the
fattest" instead of 'survival of the fittest."
--
Gregory Hall
Ragnar
2011-01-24 20:01:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
The question you pose also demonstrates the difference between an alpha male
like myself and a feminized, estrogen-laden, fat loser like Ragnar.
Alpha male?? ROTFLMAO. You get funnier and funnier by the day,
bubbles. The alpha male requires the ability to achieve a functional
erection to even be considered anywhere near alpha. Since you admit to
having shall we say issues with flaccidity you don’t fucking qualify.

Ragnar
Leonardo
2011-01-25 01:26:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.

First about the 500 pounder. Not only NO, but HELL NO!. Simply
totally out of the question. Period. I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.

Now as for the Hotsie. I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card. I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.

Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.

If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male. Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole. If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie". Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.

As for how some of the others here answered. I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either. They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.


Leonardo
Checkmate
2011-01-25 02:00:51 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder. Not only NO, but HELL NO!. Simply
totally out of the question. Period. I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie. I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card. I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male. Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole. If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie". Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered. I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either. They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo
That's the way most NORMAL men would look at it, Leo. Hell, even if she stunk
and refused to take a shower with me, I'd still want to at least see her naked.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-25 14:55:19 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo
That's the way most NORMAL men would look at it, Leo.  Hell, even if she stunk
and refused to take a shower with me, I'd still want to at least see her naked.
Excuse me but what the fuck would a faggot like you know about this
issue? I’ll bet you haven’t been laid by a woman since the fall of
Saigon and that was probably a case of gender confusion.

Stick to what you know; man ass, alt. politics homosexual and gay
porn.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-25 17:11:11 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo
That's the way most NORMAL men would look at it, Leo.  Hell, even if she stunk
and refused to take a shower with me, I'd still want to at least see her naked.
Excuse me but what the fuck would a faggot like you know about this
issue? I?ll bet you haven?t been laid by a woman since the fall of
Saigon and that was probably a case of gender confusion.
Stick to what you know; man ass, alt. politics homosexual and gay
porn.
Ragnar
Yer gay...
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-25 23:01:50 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo
That's the way most NORMAL men would look at it, Leo.  Hell, even if she stunk
and refused to take a shower with me, I'd still want to at least see her naked.
Excuse me but what the fuck would a faggot like you know about this
issue? I?ll bet you haven?t been laid by a woman since the fall of
Saigon and that was probably a case of gender confusion.
Stick to what you know; man ass, alt. politics homosexual and gay
porn.
Ragnar
Yer gay...
IKYABWAI.

Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-25 14:49:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo- Hide quoted text -
No normal guy will choose a woman who smells. I don’t care how you
qualify it, if she smells it’s a turn off for any NORMAL male, unless
of course he also smells and then nasty funk is no biggie.

BTW, the question really doesn’t leave room for elaboration or
qualification on the kind of smell or where it comes from. The
question is quite clear in its meaning and it indicates woman that
hasn’t washed in days. If half of you were as experienced with girls
as you claim; you would know exactly what that entails and you would
know that no matter what size she is it’s never pleasant or sexy in
any way.

You clowns really need to stop tap dancing around the question but
then again it's to be expected.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-25 17:10:20 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo- Hide quoted text -
No normal guy will choose a woman who smells. I don?t care how you
qualify it, if she smells it?s a turn off for any NORMAL male, unless
of course he also smells and then nasty funk is no biggie.
BTW, the question really doesn?t leave room for elaboration or
qualification on the kind of smell or where it comes from. The
question is quite clear in its meaning and it indicates woman that
hasn?t washed in days. If half of you were as experienced with girls
as you claim; you would know exactly what that entails and you would
know that no matter what size she is it?s never pleasant or sexy in
any way.
You clowns really need to stop tap dancing around the question but
then again it's to be expected.
Ragnar
You're missing the obvious, Rags. A stinky woman can be cleaned up, whereas a
fat woman is still gonna be fat.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-25 23:00:51 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo- Hide quoted text -
No normal guy will choose a woman who smells. I don?t care how you
qualify it, if she smells it?s a turn off for any NORMAL male, unless
of course he also smells and then nasty funk is no biggie.
BTW, the question really doesn?t leave room for elaboration or
qualification on the kind of smell or where it comes from. The
question is quite clear in its meaning and it indicates woman that
hasn?t washed in days. If half of you were as experienced with girls
as you claim; you would know exactly what that entails and you would
know that no matter what size she is it?s never pleasant or sexy in
any way.
You clowns really need to stop tap dancing around the question but
then again it's to be expected.
Ragnar
You're missing the obvious, Rags.  A stinky woman can be cleaned up, whereas a
fat woman is still gonna be fat.
Who has time to teach some smelly pig twat proper hygiene and unless
you are desperate to get laid; why would you want to?
If the filthy stinker in question didn’t learn basic hygiene as a
child then they’re hopeless. If a woman can’t even manage to bathe on
a daily basis imagine what kind of individual she must be? Washing is
just a basic cultural requirement that everyone should be aware of.
It’s not only for your own health wellbeing but for the health and
wellbeing of those you come in contact with and under normal
circumstances it should be second nature. Now I’m not talking about
the homeless or those who through some extenuating circumstance don’t
have access to washing facilities, I’m talking about people like
Gweggy who are perfectly capable of bathing but choose not to because
they are slobs. These dirty creeps feel that the rest of us should
just enjoy their special musk as much as they themselves do because
they are too inconsiderate, too lazy or too stupid to do something
about it.

There are few things that make me gag but being stuck in close
proximity with someone who doesn’t have the common courtesy to use
soap and water too often is one of them. People who don’t bathe are
carriers of filth and disease. If you look at 13th and 14th century
Europe and the Black Death there is a direct correlation between the
spread of the plague and societal hygiene habits. Also if you look at
surgical survival rates pre 20th century you can also see that death
from infection was directly correlated to patient hygiene. In other
words, human filth is deadly. If you look at history, poor human
hygiene and the unsanitary conditions that are caused by human filth
have been the reasons for almost every outbreak and spread of deadly
communicable disease known to man.

BTW, it doesn’t matter if she is fat or not and it doesn’t matter who
or what you are into, just pick one that passes the smell test
everyday and you’ll be healthier for it.

Is it just me or does all this sound strangely familiar to you?

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-26 04:32:08 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
I will peek out from  my usual lurker mode and add a few comments to
this interesting question.
First about the 500 pounder.  Not only NO, but HELL NO!.  Simply
totally out of the question.  Period.  I would never do that dishonor
to my Dick.
Now as for the Hotsie.  I can not imagine me or any of the others here
making their first move by asking to see her documented frequency of
shower card.  I am also not going to ask her to remove her Blouse so I
can take of whiff of her under arms before I agree to jump her bones.
Now if she was so ripe that I could smell her from ten feet away I
might just keep on walking. Or maybe I would suggest that she come to
my place where we could freshen up a bit first.  
If she had just finished eating an onion sandwich I would not be
deterred from performing my duty as a healthy male.  Maybe not
plopping big smooches on her pie hole.  If she turned out to be an
Italian Lass who eats a lot of Garlic then it would be a case of
"C'est la vie".    Or E la vita in Italian and then proceed with the
matter at hand.
As for how some of the others here answered.  I don't think they would
have asked to see her shower card either.  They would have simply made
an "On the Spot" evaluation and then most likely introduce her to Mr.
Happy with no other questions asked.
Leonardo- Hide quoted text -
No normal guy will choose a woman who smells. I don?t care how you
qualify it, if she smells it?s a turn off for any NORMAL male, unless
of course he also smells and then nasty funk is no biggie.
BTW, the question really doesn?t leave room for elaboration or
qualification on the kind of smell or where it comes from. The
question is quite clear in its meaning and it indicates woman that
hasn?t washed in days. If half of you were as experienced with girls
as you claim; you would know exactly what that entails and you would
know that no matter what size she is it?s never pleasant or sexy in
any way.
You clowns really need to stop tap dancing around the question but
then again it's to be expected.
Ragnar
You're missing the obvious, Rags.  A stinky woman can be cleaned up, whereas a
fat woman is still gonna be fat.
Who has time to teach some smelly pig twat proper hygiene and unless
you are desperate to get laid; why would you want to?
If the filthy stinker in question didn?t learn basic hygiene as a
child then they?re hopeless. If a woman can?t even manage to bathe on
a daily basis imagine what kind of individual she must be? Washing is
just a basic cultural requirement that everyone should be aware of.
It?s not only for your own health wellbeing but for the health and
wellbeing of those you come in contact with and under normal
circumstances it should be second nature. Now I?m not talking about
the homeless or those who through some extenuating circumstance don?t
have access to washing facilities, I?m talking about people like
Gweggy who are perfectly capable of bathing but choose not to because
they are slobs. These dirty creeps feel that the rest of us should
just enjoy their special musk as much as they themselves do because
they are too inconsiderate, too lazy or too stupid to do something
about it.
There are few things that make me gag but being stuck in close
proximity with someone who doesn?t have the common courtesy to use
soap and water too often is one of them. People who don?t bathe are
carriers of filth and disease. If you look at 13th and 14th century
Europe and the Black Death there is a direct correlation between the
spread of the plague and societal hygiene habits. Also if you look at
surgical survival rates pre 20th century you can also see that death
from infection was directly correlated to patient hygiene. In other
words, human filth is deadly. If you look at history, poor human
hygiene and the unsanitary conditions that are caused by human filth
have been the reasons for almost every outbreak and spread of deadly
communicable disease known to man.
BTW, it doesn?t matter if she is fat or not and it doesn?t matter who
or what you are into, just pick one that passes the smell test
everyday and you?ll be healthier for it.
Is it just me or does all this sound strangely familiar to you?
Ragnar
Yer gay.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Leonardo
2011-01-26 06:50:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.

Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.

This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)

To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .

This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..

Leonardo.
Ragnar
2011-01-26 15:46:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.  
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
I didn’t think it needed to be said; dumbass. Where the hell have you
been; under a rock?
As for red herrings they were thrown in well before I said anything.
Most of the posters here are desperately trying to qualify the level
of cleanliness while making excuses for picking a dirty unwashed
chick. Hey if your are just flat out disgusting and willing to fuck
any filthy creature coming down the pike then so be it. It’s your
dick.
Post by Leonardo
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story.  (for career purposes,  perhaps)
Keep reaching. The truth is out there but I doubt you or anyone else
here will ever find it.

BTW, exactly what kind of career requires a man to have a fat wife?
Post by Leonardo
 To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
The situation the OP put forth doesn’t stipulate one day, please read
and this time comprehend. It says hasn’t showered in two days which
technically is two going on 3 days. At that point it might just as
well be a week. Stop trying to make the situation work in order to
coincide with your point of view. The circumstances are very clear so
weaseling your way through this is really unnecessary.
Post by Leonardo
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay.  If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
That’s what I keep saying to Checkers but the little faggot, he never
listens.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-26 20:51:02 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.  
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
I didn?t think it needed to be said; dumbass. Where the hell have you
been; under a rock?
As for red herrings they were thrown in well before I said anything.
Most of the posters here are desperately trying to qualify the level
of cleanliness while making excuses for picking a dirty unwashed
chick. Hey if your are just flat out disgusting and willing to fuck
any filthy creature coming down the pike then so be it. It?s your
dick.
Post by Leonardo
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story.  (for career purposes,  perhaps)
Keep reaching. The truth is out there but I doubt you or anyone else
here will ever find it.
BTW, exactly what kind of career requires a man to have a fat wife?
Post by Leonardo
 To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
The situation the OP put forth doesn?t stipulate one day, please read
and this time comprehend. It says hasn?t showered in two days which
technically is two going on 3 days. At that point it might just as
well be a week. Stop trying to make the situation work in order to
coincide with your point of view. The circumstances are very clear so
weaseling your way through this is really unnecessary.
Post by Leonardo
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay.  If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
That?s what I keep saying to Checkers but the little faggot, he never
listens.
Yer still gay, you double-dumbass pole-smoking Jersey Guido.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-27 17:17:11 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
 I didn?t think it needed to be said; dumbass. Where the hell have you
been; under a rock?
As for red herrings they were thrown in well before I said anything.
Most of the posters here are desperately trying to qualify the level
of cleanliness while making excuses for picking a dirty unwashed
chick. Hey if your are just flat out disgusting and willing to fuck
any filthy creature coming down the pike then so be it. It?s your
dick.
Post by Leonardo
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
Keep reaching. The truth is out there but I doubt you or anyone else
here will ever find it.
BTW, exactly what kind of career requires a man to have a fat wife?
Post by Leonardo
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
 The situation the OP put forth doesn?t stipulate one day, please read
and this time comprehend. It says hasn?t showered in two days which
technically is two going on 3 days. At that point it might just as
well be a week. Stop trying to make the situation work in order to
coincide with your point of view. The circumstances are very clear so
weaseling your way through this is really unnecessary.
Post by Leonardo
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
That?s what I keep saying to Checkers but the little faggot, he never
listens.
Yer still gay, you double-dumbass pole-smoking Jersey Guido.
I’m not Italian, you dumb faggot ass fuck.

Stop watching MTV and jacking your bird to the shirtless dudes on
Jersey Shore, you pathetic old queen. You’re disgusting.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-27 17:51:18 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
 I didn?t think it needed to be said; dumbass. Where the hell have you
been; under a rock?
As for red herrings they were thrown in well before I said anything.
Most of the posters here are desperately trying to qualify the level
of cleanliness while making excuses for picking a dirty unwashed
chick. Hey if your are just flat out disgusting and willing to fuck
any filthy creature coming down the pike then so be it. It?s your
dick.
Post by Leonardo
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
Keep reaching. The truth is out there but I doubt you or anyone else
here will ever find it.
BTW, exactly what kind of career requires a man to have a fat wife?
Post by Leonardo
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
 The situation the OP put forth doesn?t stipulate one day, please read
and this time comprehend. It says hasn?t showered in two days which
technically is two going on 3 days. At that point it might just as
well be a week. Stop trying to make the situation work in order to
coincide with your point of view. The circumstances are very clear so
weaseling your way through this is really unnecessary.
Post by Leonardo
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
That?s what I keep saying to Checkers but the little faggot, he never
listens.
Yer still gay, you double-dumbass pole-smoking Jersey Guido.
I?m not Italian, you dumb faggot ass fuck.
LOL! I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2011-01-27 18:36:53 UTC
Permalink
"Checkmate" <***@The.Edge> wrote in message news:***@news.alt.net...
<snip>
Post by Checkmate
LOL! I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
Guido
2011-01-27 22:53:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
Post by Checkmate
LOL! I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true. Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean! I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
--
Guido
Ragnar
2011-01-28 14:53:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true.  Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean!  I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
Another sock Checkers? Is humping Gweggy’s idiotic post under a nom de
plume really necessary, you faggot? Why don’t you just fuck him in the
ass for real he’s begging for it and you’ve already stated that the
stench of an unwashed body isn’t really a deal breaker for you.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 16:30:46 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true.  Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean!  I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
Another sock Checkers? Is humping Gweggy?s idiotic post under a nom de
plume really necessary, you faggot? Why don?t you just fuck him in the
ass for real he?s begging for it and you?ve already stated that the
stench of an unwashed body isn?t really a deal breaker for you.
Ragnar
"you are the current king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

Thank yew!
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-28 18:27:44 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true.  Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean!  I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
Another sock Checkers? Is humping Gweggy?s idiotic post under a nom de
plume really necessary, you faggot? Why don?t you just fuck him in the
ass for real he?s begging for it and you?ve already stated that the
stench of an unwashed body isn?t really a deal breaker for you.
Ragnar
"you are the current king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
Thank yew!
Amazing; you’re the only asshole I’ve ever seen who is proud of being
caught knitting socks, lol.
Now if only you were as open about your sexual orientation.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 18:50:43 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true.  Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean!  I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
Another sock Checkers? Is humping Gweggy?s idiotic post under a nom de
plume really necessary, you faggot? Why don?t you just fuck him in the
ass for real he?s begging for it and you?ve already stated that the
stench of an unwashed body isn?t really a deal breaker for you.
Ragnar
"you are the current king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
Thank yew!
Amazing; you?re the only asshole I?ve ever seen who is proud of being
caught knitting socks, lol.
Now if only you were as open about your sexual orientation.
Ragnar
If I let you touch it, will you shut the fuck up?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-28 21:18:04 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true.  Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean!  I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
Another sock Checkers? Is humping Gweggy?s idiotic post under a nom de
plume really necessary, you faggot? Why don?t you just fuck him in the
ass for real he?s begging for it and you?ve already stated that the
stench of an unwashed body isn?t really a deal breaker for you.
Ragnar
"you are the current king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
Thank yew!
Amazing; you?re the only asshole I?ve ever seen who is proud of being
caught knitting socks, lol.
Now if only you were as open about your sexual orientation.
Ragnar
If I let you touch it, will you shut the fuck up?
Touch it??!!!! FUCK NO. I don’t even want to know it exists.

BTW, doesn’t your boyfriend get jealous when you proposition strange
men on the net like this?

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 22:42:11 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
It'sa true.  Ragnar is notta Italian, butta he's gotta little Italian "IN" him,
if you know what I mean!  I just pumped him lika he pulled into the full-serve
island.
Another sock Checkers? Is humping Gweggy?s idiotic post under a nom de
plume really necessary, you faggot? Why don?t you just fuck him in the
ass for real he?s begging for it and you?ve already stated that the
stench of an unwashed body isn?t really a deal breaker for you.
Ragnar
"you are the current king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
Thank yew!
Amazing; you?re the only asshole I?ve ever seen who is proud of being
caught knitting socks, lol.
Now if only you were as open about your sexual orientation.
Ragnar
If I let you touch it, will you shut the fuck up?
Touch it??!!!! FUCK NO. I don?t even want to know it exists.
But you do... don't you?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-28 14:42:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
I covered what need to be covered. There was no need to address the
portions that constituted Checkmate’s obvious projection. Now shut up
and eat your mush before the nurse has to beat you again.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 16:25:46 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<snip>
LOL!  I call you a pole-smoking gay Jersey Guido, and all you deny is that
you're Italian!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
PRICELESS!
I covered what need to be covered. There was no need to address the
portions that constituted Checkmate?s obvious projection. Now shut up
and eat your mush before the nurse has to beat you again.
Ragnar
You fags can be SO sensitive! BTW, I believe you when you say you're not
Italian... Greek, perhaps? LOL!
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2011-01-27 16:00:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one
and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
Ragnar is one of those obese people who are obese because of a defective
mind. His every post pretty much proves his defective mind is the problem
and this scenario of the disgusting, fat hog, obese but bathed and perfumed
woman vs. the unwashed, natural-smelling, nubile hottie demonstrates further
that Ragnar is flat out afraid of normal sexuality where sex is not always
accomplished right after the sex partners have just exited the shower or
bathtub. Having real, animalistic, multi-orgasmic, man-on-woman sex
necessarily involves animalistic smells and not some artificial, perfumed,
silk sheet, environment as if the man was some kind of sensitive girly man
afraid to use his nose for one of it's intended purposes.

Yet, Ragnar has put at the top of his priority list a clean and perfumed sex
partner and chooses an obese, monstrous woman who is but a parody of
womanhood, but smells like a cologne bottle of artificiality. Ragnar prefers
factory-concocted, perfumed fantasy over natural-environment, pheromone
reality which is PROOF POSITIVE that Rags is afraid of normal, human
sexuality. For him, in his warped world he'd rather abide an obese partner,
who has substituted unnatural perfumes in lieu of natural body odors
resulting in a natural and normal-sized body which does not become anywhere
near as rank as an obese body no matter if the nubile hasn't bathed for an
entire year. In other words, Ragnar, because of his defective mind, can't
function in the normal world anymore.
--
Gregory Hall
--
Gregory Hall
Ragnar
2011-01-27 17:06:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue
between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one
and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
Ragnar is one of those obese people who are obese because of a defective
mind. His every post pretty much proves his defective mind is the problem
and this scenario of the disgusting, fat hog, obese but bathed and perfumed
woman vs. the unwashed, natural-smelling, nubile hottie demonstrates further
that Ragnar is flat out afraid of normal sexuality where sex is not always
accomplished right after the sex partners have just exited the shower or
bathtub. Having real, animalistic, multi-orgasmic, man-on-woman sex
necessarily involves animalistic smells and not some artificial, perfumed,
silk sheet, environment as if the man was some kind of sensitive girly man
afraid to use his nose for one of it's intended purposes.
Yet, Ragnar has put at the top of his priority list a clean and perfumed sex
partner and chooses an obese, monstrous woman who is but a parody of
womanhood, but smells like a cologne bottle of artificiality. Ragnar prefers
factory-concocted, perfumed fantasy over natural-environment, pheromone
reality which is PROOF POSITIVE that Rags is afraid of normal, human
sexuality. For him, in his warped world he'd rather abide an obese partner,
who has substituted unnatural perfumes in lieu of natural body odors
resulting in a natural and normal-sized body which does not become anywhere
near as rank as an obese body no matter if the nubile hasn't bathed for an
entire year.  In other words, Ragnar, because of his defective mind, can't
function in the normal world anymore.
You wouldn’t know a pheromone if it walked up to you bit you in your
withered old ass. Humans lack the olfactory organ need to detect odors
like those produced by pheromones, you moronic nut-job.
What you smell is your own stench or the stench of the dirty bitches
that you have access to, you filthy creature. Take a bath and stop
intruding on others with your dirt concocted, noxious, stale musk.

No wonder you are so afraid of vagina; you’ve only been with the
filthy unwashed kind. I guess if I only had contact with dirty
unwashed cunt I’d hate women too. But then again when you live in one
big trailer park surround by alligator infested swamp, you get used to
foul smells and unwashed hicks

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-27 21:59:44 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-28 14:48:18 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.  
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story.  (for career purposes,  perhaps)
 To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay.  If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree.  I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife.  What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong. But we both
know that will never happen because I don’t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.

BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you’ve already hit the bottom and can’t sink any lower.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 16:29:56 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness.   However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"  
If each of these two women were making it known  that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice.  You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior  statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.  
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story.  (for career purposes,  perhaps)
 To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay.  If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree.  I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife.  What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-28 18:25:15 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar.  When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn’t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido’s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.

Have a nice weekend splooge gobbler.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 18:49:33 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar.  When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before? Oh, yeah... you copied
it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Have a nice weekend splooge gobbler.
You too. Say hi to Guido for us, and don't forget to swallow!
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-28 21:14:07 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar.  When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..."  Where have I heard THAT before?  
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual.  Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.

Face it dickwad; you’ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind. I’m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.

Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-28 22:40:20 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar.  When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..."  Where have I heard THAT before?  
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual.  Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?

"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.

"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
Ragnar
2011-01-31 14:56:22 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much.  It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity.  You've been fag-laming me back ever since.  I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton.  Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don’t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn’t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and  low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course.  Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though.  LOL!  If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp.  Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it?  You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it’s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought. You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me. Everything you do in
this group is by my design and if it wasn’t for me you entire posting
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
You’re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL!  You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember?  I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I?  God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already. I
suppose now I can’t wish you a good weekend twice??? What’s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-31 15:52:44 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much.  It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity.  You've been fag-laming me back ever since.  I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton.  Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course. That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy. I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally". There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen. The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian. I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway. Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now. The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and  low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course.  Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though.  LOL!  If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp.  Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it?  You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"? WTF does THAT mean?
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that! You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.
How ironic...
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"? WTF does THAT mean? Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode. Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?). You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL!  You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember?  I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I?  God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"? WTF does that mean? I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup. You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable. Go
sit on your donut for awhile. Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong."

-Ragnar shares his latest homoerotic fantasy about me
____________________________________________________________________
Ragnar
2011-01-31 17:18:51 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course.  That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy.  I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally".  There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen.  The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian.  I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway.  Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now.  The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
 Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL. For your edification the phrase “pack your chute” goes way
back in the fag laming annals. You aren’t the first person to use it
and won’t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
“President Clinton’s Queen Berets” song parody. That goes back to his
ask don’t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I’m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I’d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren’t nearly as clever as you
think you are.

For your info:
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm

Now don’t get all pissy it’s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"?  WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that!  You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.  
How ironic...
“Parroted” lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"?  WTF does THAT mean?  Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode.  Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
“Rattled” Hardly I’m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again. You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid. About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that’s all you got. Maybe
if you weren’t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven’t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn’t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?).  You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
I don’t know or care if you spelled it correctly. But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay. Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don’t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
Who is snippy? I’m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"?  WTF does that mean?  I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup.  You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable.  Go
sit on your donut for awhile.  Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting “stretched out” was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that’s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don’t
know, I’m not a member of your sexual community so I can’t comment.

BTW, you can stop with the “cupcake” shit. I really don’t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn’t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven’t got a chance in hell.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-01-31 20:23:39 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course.  That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy.  I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally".  There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen.  The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian.  I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway.  Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now.  The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
 Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL.
It makes as much sense as your constant claims that I'm copying you, except
that you use phrases almost word-for-word, and almost immediately after I've
used them. How often have you used the phrase "pack your chute" in the last
year? Funny you'd parrot it right after I used it. It's not that I give a
rat's ass, it's just another example of your rampant hypocrisy, Cupcake.
Post by Ragnar
For your edification the phrase ?pack your chute? goes way
back in the fag laming annals.
You'd know...
Post by Ragnar
You aren?t the first person to use it
and won?t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
?President Clinton?s Queen Berets? song parody. That goes back to his
ask don?t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I?m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I?d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren?t nearly as clever as you
think you are.
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm
Now don?t get all pissy it?s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"?  WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Because you're retarded as usual, and I love pointing out all your various
malfunctions. You must have a defective mind or something.
Post by Ragnar
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that!  You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.  
How ironic...
?Parroted? lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"?  WTF does THAT mean?  Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode.  Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
?Rattled? Hardly I?m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again.
And yet... here you still are, and here you'll continue to be until I dismiss
you, Retardo. We both know you're compelled to continue dancing for me.
Post by Ragnar
You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid.
And yet... here you still are!
Post by Ragnar
About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that?s all you got.
Just some of the usual drivel that detracts from the parts where I kick your
faggoty little ass. If you've ever posted anything that you think was worth
reading a second time, let alone the first time, by all means paste it back in.
I wouldn't want anyone around here to miss any of your idiocy.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe
if you weren?t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
JEEZ! Another homoerotic fantasy involving me. You're such a FAG! You're
fucking FLAMING, Cupcake! No wonder you make so many typos. It must be hard
typing with one hand.
Post by Ragnar
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven?t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn?t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
Just an observation. LV got tired of me making her look stupider than she
already looked. You, on the other hand, are too stupid to even know when I'm
making you look stupider, so you don't seem to mind.
Post by Ragnar
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?).  You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
I don?t know or care if you spelled it correctly.
Oh, I suspect you know. After all, you're the little fairy that introduced the
rest of us to that word. One can only wonder why YOU knew so much about it.
Post by Ragnar
But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay.
LOL! Is that the story you're going with today? Is that "what you
understand"? That's interesting, because you first used it here to fag lame
me. Obviously that's the type of gay porn you prefer. Otherwise, how and why
would you have any occasion to be knowledgeable in such activities... Bukake-
Boy? You explained the term to the whole group, and now you're going with
"from what I understand"? You are so fucking transparent it's pathetically
funny.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don?t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Well hey... you're the expert here, Bukake-Boy.
Post by Ragnar
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
Who is snippy? I?m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"?  WTF does that mean?  I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup.  You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable.  Go
sit on your donut for awhile.  Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting ?stretched out? was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that?s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don?t
know, I?m not a member of your sexual community so I can?t comment.
Translation: "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Post by Ragnar
BTW, you can stop with the ?cupcake? shit. I really don?t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn?t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven?t got a chance in hell.
God, Cupcake... you're such a whiney little bitch. Why don't you go cry to
someone who gives a shit? What you need is a good bitch-slapping. Fucking
fags...
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong."

-Ragnar shares his latest homoerotic fantasy about me
____________________________________________________________________
Ragnar
2011-02-01 15:23:02 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course. That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy. I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally". There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen. The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian. I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway. Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now. The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL.
It makes as much sense as your constant claims that I'm copying you, except
that you use phrases almost word-for-word, and almost immediately after I've
used them.  How often have you used the phrase "pack your chute" in the last
year?  Funny you'd parrot it right after I used it.  It's not that I give a
rat's ass, it's just another example of your rampant hypocrisy, Cupcake.
Post by Ragnar
For your edification the phrase ?pack your chute? goes way
back in the fag laming annals.
You'd know...
Post by Ragnar
You aren?t the first person to use it
and won?t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
?President Clinton?s Queen Berets? song parody. That goes back to his
ask don?t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I?m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I?d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren?t nearly as clever as you
think you are.
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm
Now don?t get all pissy it?s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"? WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Because you're retarded as usual, and I love pointing out all your various
malfunctions.  You must have a defective mind or something.
Only tards do minor spelling lames but as I said, if that’s all you
got I guess you have to go with it. Wake me when you come up with
something real; I wouldn’t want to miss it.
Post by Ragnar
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that! You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.
How ironic...
?Parroted? lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"? WTF does THAT mean? Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode. Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
 ?Rattled? Hardly I?m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again.
And yet... here you still are, and here you'll continue to be until I dismiss
you, Retardo.  We both know you're compelled to continue dancing for me.
“Dancing for you”; another veiled gay reference. So you like the idea
of a strange guy dancing for your enjoyment? Most of us knew this
already but it’s nice to see you admit it.
Post by Ragnar
You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid.
And yet... here you still are!
If I wasn’t here you would be crowing and beating your shaved chest
about how I quit the thread. So no matter how boring or repetitious
you become I usually stick around just so you won’t get that made up
kind of satisfaction.
Post by Ragnar
About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that?s all you got.
Just some of the usual drivel that detracts from the parts where I kick your
faggoty little ass.  If you've ever posted anything that you think was worth
reading a second time, let alone the first time, by all means paste it back in.  
I wouldn't want anyone around here to miss any of your idiocy.
Nice side step; you’re almost as good at avoiding the issue as you
are sucking dick.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe
if you weren?t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
JEEZ!  Another homoerotic fantasy involving me.  You're such a FAG!  You're
fucking FLAMING, Cupcake!  No wonder you make so many typos.  It must be hard
typing with one hand.
Fantasy NO. A fantasy would imply that I’m interested in you but it’s
obvious from your posting history that it’s the other way around. I do
believe you are the little faggot who constantly seeks my attention by
starting entire threads devoted to your fantasies surrounding me.

Oh and look what we have here; “flaming” I do believe I called you
that a while ago. In fact I believe I called you a “flamer” right in
this very thread. You go on and on about me copying you but yet you
can’t even stop yourself from making mistakes that prove you to be a
liar, lol.

BTW, Polly when I called you a “flamer” I wasn’t referring to one who
gets involved in Usenet or internet flaming.
Post by Ragnar
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
 OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven?t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn?t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
Just an observation.  LV got tired of me making her look stupider than she
already looked.  You, on the other hand, are too stupid to even know when I'm
making you look stupider, so you don't seem to mind.
IKYABWAI (Typical for Checkmate)

BTW, when I said you were “in the closet” I would have expected you to
deny it, but since you didn’t, should we assume you agree with me? You
can stop the pretense of being intellectually superior. We both know
it’s a sham but I have to hand it to you; you are good at trying to
convince yourself. But we all know you are good at lying to yourself,
don’t we?
Post by Ragnar
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?). You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
 I don?t know or care if you spelled it correctly.
Oh, I suspect you know.  After all, you're the little fairy that introduced the
rest of us to that word.  One can only wonder why YOU knew so much about it.
Introduced because obviously you live under a rock. The term Bukake
has been kicking around for sometime now. It’s not like a secret of
something like that. It’s not my fault if you are somewhat of a
culturally isolated moron.
Post by Ragnar
But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay.
LOL!  Is that the story you're going with today?  Is that "what you
understand"?  That's interesting, because you first used it here to fag lame
me.  Obviously that's the type of gay porn you prefer.  Otherwise, how and why
would you have any occasion to be knowledgeable in such activities... Bukake-
Boy?  You explained the term to the whole group, and now you're going with
"from what I understand"?  You are so fucking transparent it's pathetically
funny.
No, I just insinuated that you like to have guys come in your face.
Normally Bukake is reserved for women but since you’re such a little
bitch I figured you qualified. See dumbass your lack of understanding
and perception gets you in trouble all the time. It’s not my fault
that you are too fucking stupid to get it.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don?t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Well hey... you're the expert here, Bukake-Boy.
Post by Ragnar
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
 Who is snippy? I?m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"? WTF does that mean? I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup. You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable. Go
sit on your donut for awhile. Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting ?stretched out? was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that?s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don?t
know, I?m not a member of your sexual community so I can?t comment.
Translation:  "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Post by Ragnar
BTW, you can stop with the ?cupcake? shit. I really don?t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn?t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven?t got a chance in hell.
God, Cupcake... you're such a whiney little bitch.  Why don't you go cry to
someone who gives a shit?  What you need is a good bitch-slapping.  Fucking
fags...
I already told you fag boy, I’m not interested in any of you deviant
shit. Obviously besides taking it in the ass you like to get physical
with your…..men as well. Unfortunately for you that doesn’t fly with
me either. Now that I’ve beaten you to a pulp you may now go and have
your boyfriend lick your wounds and tell you it’s going to be alright.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-02-01 22:48:54 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course. That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy. I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally". There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen. The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian. I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway. Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now. The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL.
It makes as much sense as your constant claims that I'm copying you, except
that you use phrases almost word-for-word, and almost immediately after I've
used them.  How often have you used the phrase "pack your chute" in the last
year?  Funny you'd parrot it right after I used it.  It's not that I give a
rat's ass, it's just another example of your rampant hypocrisy, Cupcake.
Post by Ragnar
For your edification the phrase ?pack your chute? goes way
back in the fag laming annals.
You'd know...
Post by Ragnar
You aren?t the first person to use it
and won?t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
?President Clinton?s Queen Berets? song parody. That goes back to his
ask don?t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I?m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I?d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren?t nearly as clever as you
think you are.
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm
Now don?t get all pissy it?s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"? WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Because you're retarded as usual, and I love pointing out all your various
malfunctions.  You must have a defective mind or something.
Only tards do minor spelling lames but as I said, if that?s all you
got I guess you have to go with it. Wake me when you come up with
something real; I wouldn?t want to miss it.
Since when have you ever missed anything I throw at you, Obsesso? It doesn't
matter if it's a "minor spelling lame". You're compelled to respond to
whatever bone I toss you.
Post by Ragnar
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that! You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.
How ironic...
?Parroted? lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"? WTF does THAT mean? Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode. Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
 ?Rattled? Hardly I?m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again.
And yet... here you still are, and here you'll continue to be until I dismiss
you, Retardo.  We both know you're compelled to continue dancing for me.
?Dancing for you?; another veiled gay reference. So you like the idea
of a strange guy dancing for your enjoyment? Most of us knew this
already but it?s nice to see you admit it.
Well, as guys go, you ARE one of the strangest and, as the "current king shit
of the puppeteers in this group," it's only natural that I'd make you dance for
me... and dance, you must!
Post by Ragnar
You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid.
And yet... here you still are!
If I wasn?t here you would be crowing and beating your shaved chest
about how I quit the thread.
So in other words, I MADE you reply to me because you feel you need to impress
me somehow. I guess you just have to keep on dancing then, little puppet...
So no matter how boring or repetitious
you become I usually stick around just so you won?t get that made up
kind of satisfaction.
Why do you care what I think of you? Oh... I guess we've already been over
that. It's because I OWN you.
Post by Ragnar
About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that?s all you got.
Just some of the usual drivel that detracts from the parts where I kick your
faggoty little ass.  If you've ever posted anything that you think was worth
reading a second time, let alone the first time, by all means paste it back in.  
I wouldn't want anyone around here to miss any of your idiocy.
Nice side step; you?re almost as good at avoiding the issue as you
are sucking dick.
You're projecting again, Cupcake. I'll bet if I could ask that giant fag hag
of yours, she'd confirm that you've seen more cocks than a poultry farm.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe
if you weren?t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
JEEZ!  Another homoerotic fantasy involving me.  You're such a FAG!  You're
fucking FLAMING, Cupcake!  No wonder you make so many typos.  It must be hard
typing with one hand.
Fantasy NO. A fantasy would imply that I?m interested in you but it?s
obvious from your posting history that it?s the other way around. I do
believe you are the little faggot who constantly seeks my attention by
starting entire threads devoted to your fantasies surrounding me.
Threads that you're compelled to respond to, I might add.
Oh and look what we have here; ?flaming? I do believe I called you
that a while ago. In fact I believe I called you a ?flamer? right in
this very thread. You go on and on about me copying you but yet you
can?t even stop yourself from making mistakes that prove you to be a
liar, lol.
I'm sure I'm not the first person to call you a flaming fag, and I'm pretty
sure I won't be the last, Cupcake.
BTW, Polly when I called you a ?flamer? I wasn?t referring to one who
gets involved in Usenet or internet flaming.
Who the fuck cares what you were referring to? You still haven't figured out
that a fag like you calling someone else a fag doesn't carry any weight or
credence whatsoever. I really don't give a flying fuck what you choose to call
me, Bukake-Boy... you obviously know far too much about faggotry to possibly be
straight, so keep those killer PKBs coming.
Post by Ragnar
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
 OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven?t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn?t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
Just an observation.  LV got tired of me making her look stupider than she
already looked.  You, on the other hand, are too stupid to even know when I'm
making you look stupider, so you don't seem to mind.
IKYABWAI (Typical for Checkmate)
BTW, when I said you were ?in the closet? I would have expected you to
deny it, but since you didn?t, should we assume you agree with me?
Unlike you, I really don't feel the need to deny every little lame you come up
with, Cupcake. You're the one who married a fat fag hag... not me. Oh, and
let me remind you that when I called you a pole-smoking faggot and a Jersey
Guido, you felt very compelled to deny the part about you being Italian, but
not the rest. Are you SURE this is an issue you'd like to pursue? LOL!
You
can stop the pretense of being intellectually superior. We both know
it?s a sham but I have to hand it to you; you are good at trying to
convince yourself. But we all know you are good at lying to yourself,
don?t we?
Rags, I'd love to sit down and take an IQ test with you. You can't even put
together a coherent sentence half the time.
Post by Ragnar
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?). You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
 I don?t know or care if you spelled it correctly.
Oh, I suspect you know.  After all, you're the little fairy that introduced the
rest of us to that word.  One can only wonder why YOU knew so much about it.
Introduced because obviously you live under a rock. The term Bukake
has been kicking around for sometime now. It?s not like a secret of
something like that. It?s not my fault if you are somewhat of a
culturally isolated moron.
Not knowing the Japanese term for a circle jerk hardly makes me "culturally
isolated," Queer-Bait. It figures that you'd consider that "culture" in your
convoluted little pea-brain.
Post by Ragnar
But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay.
LOL!  Is that the story you're going with today?  Is that "what you
understand"?  That's interesting, because you first used it here to fag lame
me.  Obviously that's the type of gay porn you prefer.  Otherwise, how and why
would you have any occasion to be knowledgeable in such activities... Bukake-
Boy?  You explained the term to the whole group, and now you're going with
"from what I understand"?  You are so fucking transparent it's pathetically
funny.
No, I just insinuated that you like to have guys come in your face.
Normally Bukake is reserved for women but since you?re such a little
bitch I figured you qualified. See dumbass your lack of understanding
and perception gets you in trouble all the time. It?s not my fault
that you are too fucking stupid to get it.
So as an expert on Japanese homosexual "culture," how many guys have had the
privilege of coming in your face? Did you swallow, Bukake-Boy?
Post by Ragnar
Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don?t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Well hey... you're the expert here, Bukake-Boy.
Post by Ragnar
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
 Who is snippy? I?m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"? WTF does that mean? I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup. You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable. Go
sit on your donut for awhile. Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting ?stretched out? was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that?s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don?t
know, I?m not a member of your sexual community so I can?t comment.
Translation:  "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Post by Ragnar
BTW, you can stop with the ?cupcake? shit. I really don?t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn?t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven?t got a chance in hell.
God, Cupcake... you're such a whiney little bitch.  Why don't you go cry to
someone who gives a shit?  What you need is a good bitch-slapping.  Fucking
fags...
I already told you fag boy, I?m not interested in any of you deviant
shit. Obviously besides taking it in the ass you like to get physical
with your?..men as well. Unfortunately for you that doesn?t fly with
me either. Now that I?ve beaten you to a pulp you may now go and have
your boyfriend lick your wounds and tell you it?s going to be alright.
Ragnar
Oh, is that what you just did? You "beat me to a pulp"? Listen, FAGnar. The
more you prance around here projecting your homoerotic fantasies about me, and
the deeper into the gutter I trick you into crawling, the more pathetic you
look. Now wipe off the tears (and your chin), and go tell your fag hag you
need a hug. We'll pick up where we left off tomorrow... um-kay?
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong."

-Ragnar shares his latest homoerotic fantasy about me
____________________________________________________________________
Ragnar
2011-02-04 17:41:38 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course. That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy. I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally". There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen. The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian. I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway. Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now. The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL.
It makes as much sense as your constant claims that I'm copying you, except
that you use phrases almost word-for-word, and almost immediately after I've
used them. How often have you used the phrase "pack your chute" in the last
year? Funny you'd parrot it right after I used it. It's not that I give a
rat's ass, it's just another example of your rampant hypocrisy, Cupcake.
Post by Ragnar
For your edification the phrase ?pack your chute? goes way
back in the fag laming annals.
You'd know...
Post by Ragnar
You aren?t the first person to use it
and won?t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
?President Clinton?s Queen Berets? song parody. That goes back to his
ask don?t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I?m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I?d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren?t nearly as clever as you
think you are.
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm
Now don?t get all pissy it?s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"? WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Because you're retarded as usual, and I love pointing out all your various
malfunctions. You must have a defective mind or something.
 Only tards do minor spelling lames but as I said, if that?s all you
got I guess you have to go with it. Wake me when you come up with
something real; I wouldn?t want to miss it.
Since when have you ever missed anything I throw at you, Obsesso?  It doesn't
matter if it's a "minor spelling lame".  You're compelled to respond to
whatever bone I toss you.
Post by Ragnar
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that! You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.
How ironic...
?Parroted? lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"? WTF does THAT mean? Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode. Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
?Rattled? Hardly I?m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again.
And yet... here you still are, and here you'll continue to be until I dismiss
you, Retardo. We both know you're compelled to continue dancing for me.
 ?Dancing for you?; another veiled gay reference. So you like the idea
of a strange guy dancing for your enjoyment? Most of us knew this
already but it?s nice to see you admit it.
Well, as guys go, you ARE one of the strangest and, as the "current king shit
of the puppeteers in this group," it's only natural that I'd make you dance for
me... and dance, you must!  
Post by Ragnar
You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid.
And yet... here you still are!
 If I wasn?t here you would be crowing and beating your shaved chest
about how I quit the thread.
So in other words, I MADE you reply to me because you feel you need to impress
me somehow.  I guess you just have to keep on dancing then, little puppet...
So no matter how boring or repetitious
you become I usually stick around just so you won?t get that made up
kind of satisfaction.
Why do you care what I think of you?  Oh... I guess we've already been over
that.  It's because I OWN you.
Post by Ragnar
About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that?s all you got.
Just some of the usual drivel that detracts from the parts where I kick your
faggoty little ass. If you've ever posted anything that you think was worth
reading a second time, let alone the first time, by all means paste it back in.
I wouldn't want anyone around here to miss any of your idiocy.
 Nice side step; you?re almost as good at avoiding the issue as you
are sucking dick.
You're projecting again, Cupcake.  I'll bet if I could ask that giant fag hag
of yours, she'd confirm that you've seen more cocks than a poultry farm.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe
if you weren?t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
JEEZ! Another homoerotic fantasy involving me. You're such a FAG! You're
fucking FLAMING, Cupcake! No wonder you make so many typos. It must be hard
typing with one hand.
Fantasy NO. A fantasy would imply that I?m interested in you but it?s
obvious from your posting history that it?s the other way around. I do
believe you are the little faggot who constantly seeks my attention by
starting entire threads devoted to your fantasies surrounding me.
Threads that you're compelled to respond to, I might add.
 Oh and look what we have here; ?flaming? I do believe I called you
that a while ago. In fact I believe I called you a ?flamer? right in
this very thread. You go on and on about me copying you but yet you
can?t even stop yourself from making mistakes that prove you to be a
liar, lol.
I'm sure I'm not the first person to call you a flaming fag, and I'm pretty
sure I won't be the last, Cupcake.
BTW, Polly when I called you a ?flamer? I wasn?t referring to one who
gets involved in Usenet or internet flaming.
Who the fuck cares what you were referring to?  You still haven't figured out
that a fag like you calling someone else a fag doesn't carry any weight or
credence whatsoever.  I really don't give a flying fuck what you choose to call
me, Bukake-Boy... you obviously know far too much about faggotry to possibly be
straight, so keep those killer PKBs coming.
Post by Ragnar
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven?t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn?t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
Just an observation. LV got tired of me making her look stupider than she
already looked. You, on the other hand, are too stupid to even know when I'm
making you look stupider, so you don't seem to mind.
IKYABWAI (Typical for Checkmate)
BTW, when I said you were ?in the closet? I would have expected you to
deny it, but since you didn?t, should we assume you agree with me?
Unlike you, I really don't feel the need to deny every little lame you come up
with, Cupcake.  You're the one who married a fat fag hag... not me.  Oh, and
let me remind you that when I called you a pole-smoking faggot and a Jersey
Guido, you felt very compelled to deny the part about you being Italian, but
not the rest.  Are you SURE this is an issue you'd like to pursue?  LOL!
You
can stop the pretense of being intellectually superior. We both know
it?s a sham but I have to hand it to you; you are good at trying to
convince yourself. But we all know you are good at lying to yourself,
don?t we?
Rags, I'd love to sit down and take an IQ test with you.  You can't even put
together a coherent sentence half the time.
Post by Ragnar
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?). You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
I don?t know or care if you spelled it correctly.
Oh, I suspect you know. After all, you're the little fairy that introduced the
rest of us to that word. One can only wonder why YOU knew so much about it.
Introduced because obviously you live under a rock. The term Bukake
has been kicking around for sometime now. It?s not like a secret of
something like that. It?s not my fault if you are somewhat of a
culturally isolated moron.
Not knowing the Japanese term for a circle jerk hardly makes me "culturally
isolated," Queer-Bait.  It figures that you'd consider that "culture" in your
convoluted little pea-brain.
Post by Ragnar
But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay.
LOL! Is that the story you're going with today? Is that "what you
understand"? That's interesting, because you first used it here to fag lame
me. Obviously that's the type of gay porn you prefer. Otherwise, how and why
would you have any occasion to be knowledgeable in such activities... Bukake-
Boy? You explained the term to the whole group, and now you're going with
"from what I understand"? You are so fucking transparent it's pathetically
funny.
No, I just insinuated that you like to have guys come in your face.
Normally Bukake is reserved for women but since you?re such a little
bitch I figured you qualified. See dumbass your lack of understanding
and perception gets you in trouble all the time. It?s not my fault
that you are too fucking stupid to get it.
So as an expert on Japanese homosexual "culture," how many guys have had the
privilege of coming in your face?  Did you swallow, Bukake-Boy?
Post by Ragnar
Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don?t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Well hey... you're the expert here, Bukake-Boy.
Post by Ragnar
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
Who is snippy? I?m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"? WTF does that mean? I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup. You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable. Go
sit on your donut for awhile. Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting ?stretched out? was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that?s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don?t
know, I?m not a member of your sexual community so I can?t comment.
Translation: "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Post by Ragnar
BTW, you can stop with the ?cupcake? shit. I really don?t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn?t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven?t got a chance in hell.
God, Cupcake... you're such a whiney little bitch. Why don't you go cry to
someone who gives a shit? What you need is a good bitch-slapping. Fucking
fags...
I already told you fag boy, I?m not interested in any of you deviant
shit. Obviously besides taking it in the ass you like to get physical
with your?..men as well. Unfortunately for you that doesn?t fly with
me either. Now that I?ve beaten you to a pulp you may now go and have
your boyfriend lick your wounds and tell you it?s going to be alright.
Ragnar
Oh, is that what you just did?  You "beat me to a pulp"?  Listen, FAGnar.  The
more you prance around here projecting your homoerotic fantasies about me, and
the deeper into the gutter I trick you into crawling, the more pathetic you
look.  Now wipe off the tears (and your chin), and go tell your fag hag you
need a hug.  We'll pick up where we left off tomorrow... um-kay?
Your entire posts amount to more bullshit than anyone should have a
right to spew.

Why don’t you just write “IKYABWAI” at the bottom of every fucking one
of my responses? It would leave you with so much more free time to
suck cock.

Ragnar
Checkmate
2011-02-04 19:40:45 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course. That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy. I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally". There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen. The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian. I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway. Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now. The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL.
It makes as much sense as your constant claims that I'm copying you, except
that you use phrases almost word-for-word, and almost immediately after I've
used them. How often have you used the phrase "pack your chute" in the last
year? Funny you'd parrot it right after I used it. It's not that I give a
rat's ass, it's just another example of your rampant hypocrisy, Cupcake.
Post by Ragnar
For your edification the phrase ?pack your chute? goes way
back in the fag laming annals.
You'd know...
Post by Ragnar
You aren?t the first person to use it
and won?t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
?President Clinton?s Queen Berets? song parody. That goes back to his
ask don?t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I?m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I?d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren?t nearly as clever as you
think you are.
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm
Now don?t get all pissy it?s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"? WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Because you're retarded as usual, and I love pointing out all your various
malfunctions. You must have a defective mind or something.
 Only tards do minor spelling lames but as I said, if that?s all you
got I guess you have to go with it. Wake me when you come up with
something real; I wouldn?t want to miss it.
Since when have you ever missed anything I throw at you, Obsesso?  It doesn't
matter if it's a "minor spelling lame".  You're compelled to respond to
whatever bone I toss you.
Post by Ragnar
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that! You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.
How ironic...
?Parroted? lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"? WTF does THAT mean? Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode. Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
?Rattled? Hardly I?m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again.
And yet... here you still are, and here you'll continue to be until I dismiss
you, Retardo. We both know you're compelled to continue dancing for me.
 ?Dancing for you?; another veiled gay reference. So you like the idea
of a strange guy dancing for your enjoyment? Most of us knew this
already but it?s nice to see you admit it.
Well, as guys go, you ARE one of the strangest and, as the "current king shit
of the puppeteers in this group," it's only natural that I'd make you dance for
me... and dance, you must!  
Post by Ragnar
You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid.
And yet... here you still are!
 If I wasn?t here you would be crowing and beating your shaved chest
about how I quit the thread.
So in other words, I MADE you reply to me because you feel you need to impress
me somehow.  I guess you just have to keep on dancing then, little puppet...
So no matter how boring or repetitious
you become I usually stick around just so you won?t get that made up
kind of satisfaction.
Why do you care what I think of you?  Oh... I guess we've already been over
that.  It's because I OWN you.
Post by Ragnar
About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that?s all you got.
Just some of the usual drivel that detracts from the parts where I kick your
faggoty little ass. If you've ever posted anything that you think was worth
reading a second time, let alone the first time, by all means paste it back in.
I wouldn't want anyone around here to miss any of your idiocy.
 Nice side step; you?re almost as good at avoiding the issue as you
are sucking dick.
You're projecting again, Cupcake.  I'll bet if I could ask that giant fag hag
of yours, she'd confirm that you've seen more cocks than a poultry farm.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe
if you weren?t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
JEEZ! Another homoerotic fantasy involving me. You're such a FAG! You're
fucking FLAMING, Cupcake! No wonder you make so many typos. It must be hard
typing with one hand.
Fantasy NO. A fantasy would imply that I?m interested in you but it?s
obvious from your posting history that it?s the other way around. I do
believe you are the little faggot who constantly seeks my attention by
starting entire threads devoted to your fantasies surrounding me.
Threads that you're compelled to respond to, I might add.
 Oh and look what we have here; ?flaming? I do believe I called you
that a while ago. In fact I believe I called you a ?flamer? right in
this very thread. You go on and on about me copying you but yet you
can?t even stop yourself from making mistakes that prove you to be a
liar, lol.
I'm sure I'm not the first person to call you a flaming fag, and I'm pretty
sure I won't be the last, Cupcake.
BTW, Polly when I called you a ?flamer? I wasn?t referring to one who
gets involved in Usenet or internet flaming.
Who the fuck cares what you were referring to?  You still haven't figured out
that a fag like you calling someone else a fag doesn't carry any weight or
credence whatsoever.  I really don't give a flying fuck what you choose to call
me, Bukake-Boy... you obviously know far too much about faggotry to possibly be
straight, so keep those killer PKBs coming.
Post by Ragnar
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven?t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn?t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
Just an observation. LV got tired of me making her look stupider than she
already looked. You, on the other hand, are too stupid to even know when I'm
making you look stupider, so you don't seem to mind.
IKYABWAI (Typical for Checkmate)
BTW, when I said you were ?in the closet? I would have expected you to
deny it, but since you didn?t, should we assume you agree with me?
Unlike you, I really don't feel the need to deny every little lame you come up
with, Cupcake.  You're the one who married a fat fag hag... not me.  Oh, and
let me remind you that when I called you a pole-smoking faggot and a Jersey
Guido, you felt very compelled to deny the part about you being Italian, but
not the rest.  Are you SURE this is an issue you'd like to pursue?  LOL!
You
can stop the pretense of being intellectually superior. We both know
it?s a sham but I have to hand it to you; you are good at trying to
convince yourself. But we all know you are good at lying to yourself,
don?t we?
Rags, I'd love to sit down and take an IQ test with you.  You can't even put
together a coherent sentence half the time.
Post by Ragnar
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?). You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
I don?t know or care if you spelled it correctly.
Oh, I suspect you know. After all, you're the little fairy that introduced the
rest of us to that word. One can only wonder why YOU knew so much about it.
Introduced because obviously you live under a rock. The term Bukake
has been kicking around for sometime now. It?s not like a secret of
something like that. It?s not my fault if you are somewhat of a
culturally isolated moron.
Not knowing the Japanese term for a circle jerk hardly makes me "culturally
isolated," Queer-Bait.  It figures that you'd consider that "culture" in your
convoluted little pea-brain.
Post by Ragnar
But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay.
LOL! Is that the story you're going with today? Is that "what you
understand"? That's interesting, because you first used it here to fag lame
me. Obviously that's the type of gay porn you prefer. Otherwise, how and why
would you have any occasion to be knowledgeable in such activities... Bukake-
Boy? You explained the term to the whole group, and now you're going with
"from what I understand"? You are so fucking transparent it's pathetically
funny.
No, I just insinuated that you like to have guys come in your face.
Normally Bukake is reserved for women but since you?re such a little
bitch I figured you qualified. See dumbass your lack of understanding
and perception gets you in trouble all the time. It?s not my fault
that you are too fucking stupid to get it.
So as an expert on Japanese homosexual "culture," how many guys have had the
privilege of coming in your face?  Did you swallow, Bukake-Boy?
Post by Ragnar
Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don?t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Well hey... you're the expert here, Bukake-Boy.
Post by Ragnar
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
Who is snippy? I?m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"? WTF does that mean? I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup. You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable. Go
sit on your donut for awhile. Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting ?stretched out? was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that?s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don?t
know, I?m not a member of your sexual community so I can?t comment.
Translation: "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Post by Ragnar
BTW, you can stop with the ?cupcake? shit. I really don?t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn?t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven?t got a chance in hell.
God, Cupcake... you're such a whiney little bitch. Why don't you go cry to
someone who gives a shit? What you need is a good bitch-slapping. Fucking
fags...
I already told you fag boy, I?m not interested in any of you deviant
shit. Obviously besides taking it in the ass you like to get physical
with your?..men as well. Unfortunately for you that doesn?t fly with
me either. Now that I?ve beaten you to a pulp you may now go and have
your boyfriend lick your wounds and tell you it?s going to be alright.
Ragnar
Oh, is that what you just did?  You "beat me to a pulp"?  Listen, FAGnar.  The
more you prance around here projecting your homoerotic fantasies about me, and
the deeper into the gutter I trick you into crawling, the more pathetic you
look.  Now wipe off the tears (and your chin), and go tell your fag hag you
need a hug.  We'll pick up where we left off tomorrow... um-kay?
Your entire posts amount to more bullshit than anyone should have a
right to spew.
Why don?t you just write ?IKYABWAI? at the bottom of every fucking one
of my responses? It would leave you with so much more free time to
suck cock.
Ragnar
TRANSLATION:

WAH! WAH! WAH!

Go sit on your donut, faggot. You're gonna completely blow out your packing
gland.
--
Checkmate
Copyright © 2011
all rights reserved


Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
____________________________________________________________________

"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"

-Wildhare
____________________________________________________________________

"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"It's pretty obvious that if I'm such a dumbass then you are a
double dumbass"

-Ragnar
____________________________________________________________________

"The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong."

-Ragnar shares his latest homoerotic fantasy about me
____________________________________________________________________
Ragnar
2011-02-07 14:12:07 UTC
Permalink
Warning!  Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Ragnar
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Leonardo
Post by Checkmate
Post by Joe
Post by Joe
This question is generated in response to the current dialogue between
Ragnar and Gregory regarding sexual attraction.
Imagine two women in this scenario.
One is a huge obese 500 lb woman with rolls and rolls of fat.
She has just emerged from the oversized shower stall.
The other is a nubile shapely 36-28-36 young woman with show girl
attractiveness. However, it has now been two days since she
showered.
Now for the "Question Of The Day"
If each of these two women were making it known that they were
anxious to have sex with you which would you choose.
The small print "It is a one time choice. You may only choose one and
then the scenario is closed"
Obviously according to prior statements from Rags and Greg, Rags
would choose the obese woman fresh from the showed and Greg would
choose the other woman fresh with natures pheromones.
How about other male readers, which one would you find the most
desirable?
Joe
Ragnar
Yer gay.
Well Checkers, I see a particular point of interest in this thread.
The original poster, one named Joe, asked a specific question as to
which of two women would be the sex partner of choice for each reader.
Several did reply and specified their choice.
The OP did apparently surmise that Ragnar would pick the huge obese
one. It is interesting to note that while Ragnar threw out a whole
truck load of red-herrings he clearly avoided either confirming or
denying that his choice would be the huge obese one or the attractive
one.
This brings to mind that you have suggested in the past that his
marriage to a huge obese female was simply part of a plan to establish
a cover story. (for career purposes, perhaps)
To me the far best way to approach the situational set up by Joe is
that if one is bothered or offended or by the one who not had bathed
on that day that he should clean her up and then shag her. Doesn't
take an expert on sex to realize the practicalities of that solution.
I don't really believe that many aroused males would be so sensitive
that a one day lapse in bathing would be factor at all. (unless she
had just spent the entire day as a worker in a chicken processing
plant) .
This is not meant as a put-down of one who is gay. If they are they
should accept it and not look asinine by constant denial..
Leonardo.
I totally agree. I don't hold it against Ragnar that he's a closet homosexual,
or that he occasionally has to perform his duty and service his fat desperate
wife. What puts me off is his constant lying and hypocrisy.
The only thing you want to hold against me is your dong.
Interesting that you would think of that...
Post by Ragnar
But we both
know that will never happen because I don?t swing that way.
Besides your boyfriend will get all jealous and shit.
BTW, fag boy hypocrisy and lying are for those who post to gay groups
and then deny being gay. Just come out already and stop all this
incessant whining and projection. Nobody here will think any less of
you; you?ve already hit the bottom and can?t sink any lower.
Ragnar
To clarify, Rags, you're not always a liar. When you said you weren't Italian,
I believe that much, and the fact that you didn't deny being a pole-smoking fag
indicates a certain degree of honesty from you as well.
Really fag boi; I like how YOU didn?t deny jerking off to shirtless
guido?s on MTV. I guess a little honesty can be thrown your way as
well.
Your desperate projection is showing again, you pathetic old queen.
Maybe your boyfriend should pack your chute so tightly this weekend;
the pain, bitterness and frustration of your ruined asshole is coming
through in your posts.
"pack your chute..." Where have I heard THAT before?
I have no idea; probably in your bunk during basic.
Oh, yeah... you copied it from ME, as usual. Don't you wish you had a mind of your own sometimes?
Like I need to copy any thing from you to try and look clever, lol.
That would be almost the worst possible road to take. The only way I
could look less intelligent would be to copy and use some of the
nonsense spewed by the great unwashed Esq.
Face it dickwad; you?ve made a career in this group out of copying
me .
Not so much. It was I who made you abandon those lofty principles you used to
claim you had by fag-laming you to the point that it threatened your dubious
masculinity. You've been fag-laming me back ever since. I've always called
the tune that you're compelled to dance to, Simpleton. Let's take a little
stroll down Memory Lane, shall we?
"Nor do I engage in juvenile gay lames like others do."
-Ragnar the Hypocrite, right after posting numerous gay lames.
"Mature, intelligent people don't consider being gay a derogatory issue
worthy of name calling."
-Ragnar the Liar, right after posting another bunch of gay lames.
Normally I don?t fag lame people and you if you bothered to pay
attention you would realize that YOU are the only one I do it to.
Of course. That's because I trolled you into exposing your hypocrisy. I love
how you try to explain it all away by saying "normally". There's nothing
normal about you, Cupcake... you're just a lying hypocritical fatty-chasing
closet queen. The only thing you've ever said that I believe is that you're
not Italian. I'm the Pied Piper, and you're the dancing rat... get used to it.
Taking the higher road with you obviously didn?t work because of your
deeply rooted sexual identity issues and blatant reliance on denial
and hypocrisy. Fag laming you seems to work a lot better because it
makes you dance and foam like a mad man and as anybody knows that is
an indication of striking very close to a nerve.
Well, that's your spin on things anyway. Just like you keep trying to convince
everyone that you're "kicking my ass," when I've had you steppin' and fetchin'
for months now. The fact that a real fag wants to call me a fag is merely a
source of amusement.
Post by Ragnar
All I have to do is respond to you and low and behold a week or
so later, you respond in kind.
Ummm, yeah... except that you're a habitual liar... except for the part about
not being Italian, of course. Your boyfriend Guido says you have a little
Italian "in" you, though. LOL! If I happen to say something similar to
something you might have said a week or so prior, it might have something to do
with the fact that we both speak the same language... except, of course, you
speak it with a lisp. Anyway, what does that say about you then, when you
repeat something word-for-word, only a day or two after I've said it? You're a
sad little man, Rags... a delusional buffoon who can't even see how pathetic he
really is, and please don't take any of this personally... I don't mean it in a
BAD way.
Grow a brain you fucking homo and stop projecting your personal
problems on me. First it?s your homophobia and now your inability to
come up with something that resembles original thought.
Like YOU, Mister "pack your chute"?
So you are saying that you coined the phrase or do you own a patent on
it, LOL.
It makes as much sense as your constant claims that I'm copying you, except
that you use phrases almost word-for-word, and almost immediately after I've
used them. How often have you used the phrase "pack your chute" in the last
year? Funny you'd parrot it right after I used it. It's not that I give a
rat's ass, it's just another example of your rampant hypocrisy, Cupcake.
Post by Ragnar
For your edification the phrase ?pack your chute? goes way
back in the fag laming annals.
You'd know...
Post by Ragnar
You aren?t the first person to use it
and won?t be the last. I remember first hearing it used in the In
?President Clinton?s Queen Berets? song parody. That goes back to his
ask don?t tell policies of the early 90s. Maybe I?m copying the author
of the parody or maybe you are as well. I?d suggest you take the self
aggrandizing down a few notches; you aren?t nearly as clever as you
think you are.
http://www.tealdragon.net/humor/poetry/qberets.htm
Now don?t get all pissy it?s just an old harmless little poem.
You really
need to work on yourself and stop looking for ways to make yourself
fell better by passing your bullshit off on me.
"fell better"? WTF does THAT mean?
Lame as usual.
Because you're retarded as usual, and I love pointing out all your various
malfunctions. You must have a defective mind or something.
Only tards do minor spelling lames but as I said, if that?s all you
got I guess you have to go with it. Wake me when you come up with
something real; I wouldn?t want to miss it.
Since when have you ever missed anything I throw at you, Obsesso? It doesn't
matter if it's a "minor spelling lame". You're compelled to respond to
whatever bone I toss you.
Post by Ragnar
Everything you do in this group is by my design
Oh, look at that! You just parroted something else I said a day or two ago.
How ironic...
?Parroted? lol, interesting use of words there, Polly.
and if it wasn?t for me you entire posting
"if it wasn?t for me you entire posting"? WTF does THAT mean? Every time I
get you rattled, you go into full-retard mode. Brace yourself, Retardo, it's
going to be a long day for you!
?Rattled? Hardly I?m just tired of answering your repeated garbage
over and over again.
And yet... here you still are, and here you'll continue to be until I dismiss
you, Retardo. We both know you're compelled to continue dancing for me.
?Dancing for you?; another veiled gay reference. So you like the idea
of a strange guy dancing for your enjoyment? Most of us knew this
already but it?s nice to see you admit it.
Well, as guys go, you ARE one of the strangest and, as the "current king shit
of the puppeteers in this group," it's only natural that I'd make you dance for
me... and dance, you must!
Post by Ragnar
You make it very difficult to remain interested
in responding to you because you are so predictably stupid.
And yet... here you still are!
If I wasn?t here you would be crowing and beating your shaved chest
about how I quit the thread.
So in other words, I MADE you reply to me because you feel you need to impress
me somehow. I guess you just have to keep on dancing then, little puppet...
So no matter how boring or repetitious
you become I usually stick around just so you won?t get that made up
kind of satisfaction.
Why do you care what I think of you? Oh... I guess we've already been over
that. It's because I OWN you.
Post by Ragnar
About the
only thing that IS interesting is what you snip out of my posts. I can
always tell when you are at a loss because you snip half the post and
fall back on spelling lames. But then again that?s all you got.
Just some of the usual drivel that detracts from the parts where I kick your
faggoty little ass. If you've ever posted anything that you think was worth
reading a second time, let alone the first time, by all means paste it back in.
I wouldn't want anyone around here to miss any of your idiocy.
Nice side step; you?re almost as good at avoiding the issue as you
are sucking dick.
You're projecting again, Cupcake. I'll bet if I could ask that giant fag hag
of yours, she'd confirm that you've seen more cocks than a poultry farm.
Post by Ragnar
Maybe
if you weren?t so interested in sucking my dick you would think
clearly enough to respond to the actual post.
JEEZ! Another homoerotic fantasy involving me. You're such a FAG! You're
fucking FLAMING, Cupcake! No wonder you make so many typos. It must be hard
typing with one hand.
Fantasy NO. A fantasy would imply that I?m interested in you but it?s
obvious from your posting history that it?s the other way around. I do
believe you are the little faggot who constantly seeks my attention by
starting entire threads devoted to your fantasies surrounding me.
Threads that you're compelled to respond to, I might add.
Oh and look what we have here; ?flaming? I do believe I called you
that a while ago. In fact I believe I called you a ?flamer? right in
this very thread. You go on and on about me copying you but yet you
can?t even stop yourself from making mistakes that prove you to be a
liar, lol.
I'm sure I'm not the first person to call you a flaming fag, and I'm pretty
sure I won't be the last, Cupcake.
BTW, Polly when I called you a ?flamer? I wasn?t referring to one who
gets involved in Usenet or internet flaming.
Who the fuck cares what you were referring to? You still haven't figured out
that a fag like you calling someone else a fag doesn't carry any weight or
credence whatsoever. I really don't give a flying fuck what you choose to call
me, Bukake-Boy... you obviously know far too much about faggotry to possibly be
straight, so keep those killer PKBs coming.
Post by Ragnar
history here would be nothing but one line lames and attacks on LV.
Unlike you, LV is smart enough not to fuck with me anymore.
OMG: how exactly do you fit that swollen head of yours in the closet
with the rest of you? You are a fucking in denial, faggot moron and
the more you try and paint yourself as intellectually superior the
dumber you look. In case you haven?t figured it out; anyone can kick
LVs ass and getting her to stop responding is no great feat. In fact,
beating up on LV is basically akin to beating on a child. It doesn?t
surprise me that a scumbag little flamer would be proud of it.
Just an observation. LV got tired of me making her look stupider than she
already looked. You, on the other hand, are too stupid to even know when I'm
making you look stupider, so you don't seem to mind.
IKYABWAI (Typical for Checkmate)
BTW, when I said you were ?in the closet? I would have expected you to
deny it, but since you didn?t, should we assume you agree with me?
Unlike you, I really don't feel the need to deny every little lame you come up
with, Cupcake. You're the one who married a fat fag hag... not me. Oh, and
let me remind you that when I called you a pole-smoking faggot and a Jersey
Guido, you felt very compelled to deny the part about you being Italian, but
not the rest. Are you SURE this is an issue you'd like to pursue? LOL!
You
can stop the pretense of being intellectually superior. We both know
it?s a sham but I have to hand it to you; you are good at trying to
convince yourself. But we all know you are good at lying to yourself,
don?t we?
Rags, I'd love to sit down and take an IQ test with you. You can't even put
together a coherent sentence half the time.
Post by Ragnar
You?re so obsessed with trying to prove to me that you aren't gay that
you embarrass yourself.
I don't feel the need to prove shit to you, Bukake-Boy (did I spell that
right?). You're the one who knows all too much about the gay life.
I don?t know or care if you spelled it correctly.
Oh, I suspect you know. After all, you're the little fairy that introduced the
rest of us to that word. One can only wonder why YOU knew so much about it.
Introduced because obviously you live under a rock. The term Bukake
has been kicking around for sometime now. It?s not like a secret of
something like that. It?s not my fault if you are somewhat of a
culturally isolated moron.
Not knowing the Japanese term for a circle jerk hardly makes me "culturally
isolated," Queer-Bait. It figures that you'd consider that "culture" in your
convoluted little pea-brain.
Post by Ragnar
But from what I
understand it referrers to a heterosexual activity and has nothing to
do with being gay.
LOL! Is that the story you're going with today? Is that "what you
understand"? That's interesting, because you first used it here to fag lame
me. Obviously that's the type of gay porn you prefer. Otherwise, how and why
would you have any occasion to be knowledgeable in such activities... Bukake-
Boy? You explained the term to the whole group, and now you're going with
"from what I understand"? You are so fucking transparent it's pathetically
funny.
No, I just insinuated that you like to have guys come in your face.
Normally Bukake is reserved for women but since you?re such a little
bitch I figured you qualified. See dumbass your lack of understanding
and perception gets you in trouble all the time. It?s not my fault
that you are too fucking stupid to get it.
So as an expert on Japanese homosexual "culture," how many guys have had the
privilege of coming in your face? Did you swallow, Bukake-Boy?
Post by Ragnar
Maybe while you are reaching for another fag lame
you should first understand what you are saying and the terminology
that you are using. You know, I don?t have to make you look stupid in
every post but you make it very hard not to.
Well hey... you're the expert here, Bukake-Boy.
Post by Ragnar
Post by Ragnar
I?m beginning to think that I need to
name you Polly but that would probably be an insult to the
intelligence of most species of parrot.
Once again, have an good ass humping weekend, you whiny little
faggot.
LOL! You already said your goodbyes for the weekend, remember? I trolled your
stretched out ass full of man juice back for some more abuse, didn't I? God,
you're a simple shit...
Oh just shut the fuck up and stuff your face with a dick already.
Damn, you fags sure can be snippy when you're pissed.
Who is snippy? I?m just giving you the green light to do what you do
and to stop denying the truth.
I
suppose now I can?t wish you a good weekend twice??? What?s the matter
Checkers; am I exposing a little too much of how you spend your free
time? Just ass it up the ass like a man and stop all the protest.
"Ass it up the ass"? WTF does that mean? I think you'd better take a time out
before you have a coronary, Buttercup. You must have gotten your tailpipe
reamed pretty hard over the weekend... it's making you really irritable. Go
sit on your donut for awhile. Eventually you'll probably get stretched out
enough that it doesn't hurt so much.
Way too much projected insight into your weekend activities. Obviously
getting ?stretched out? was your remedy for an abused butt hole so you
assume that?s the way it works for everyone. Maybe it does; I don?t
know, I?m not a member of your sexual community so I can?t comment.
Translation: "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Post by Ragnar
BTW, you can stop with the ?cupcake? shit. I really don?t know where
you come off labeling me with your faggot pet names. It doesn?t matter
how much you try and sweet talk me, you haven?t got a chance in hell.
God, Cupcake... you're such a whiney little bitch. Why don't you go cry to
someone who gives a shit? What you need is a good bitch-slapping. Fucking
fags...
I already told you fag boy, I?m not interested in any of you deviant
shit. Obviously besides taking it in the ass you like to get physical
with your?..men as well. Unfortunately for you that doesn?t fly with
me either. Now that I?ve beaten you to a pulp you may now go and have
your boyfriend lick your wounds and tell you it?s going to be alright.
Ragnar
Oh, is that what you just did? You "beat me to a pulp"? Listen, FAGnar. The
more you prance around here projecting your homoerotic fantasies about me, and
the deeper into the gutter I trick you into crawling, the more pathetic you
look. Now wipe off the tears (and your chin), and go tell your fag hag you
need a hug. We'll pick up where we left off tomorrow... um-kay?
Your entire posts amount to more bullshit than anyone should have a
right to spew.
Why don?t you just write ?IKYABWAI? at the bottom of every fucking one
of my responses? It would leave you with so much more free time to
suck cock.
Ragnar
WAH!  WAH!  WAH!
Go sit on your donut, faggot.  You're gonna completely blow out your packing
gland.
“Packing gland”?...... is that some kind of gay terminology for the
male prostate gland? Please enlighten us, faggot. Obviously you have
the inside track on these matters.

Ragnar

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...